When I was opening the packs, each pack had this strange foreign non-cardboard object. I decided to put one of them in a top loader so some day I could show my kids what used to come with hockey cards.
89-90 Topps Gum
That baby is MINT! Not flavored but mint in terms of condition. I thought it kind of silly at first but it actually does look a bit neat in person to see a top-loaded piece of gum. Anyone else out there have one of these preserved for future generations to enjoy? I have been tempted to buy another box and never open it but I haven't gone as far as doing so yet. Anyway, thanks for stopping by, I promise no more gum in my next post (not even the famous 90-91 Upper Deck Joel Otto card).
That's pretty cool! I just opened a pack of 86 Topps baseball over the weekend and the gum inside had gone moldy and damaged the bottom card.
ReplyDeleteOuch!!! That's unfortunate. I am wondering if the card spent lots of time in a humid climate or didn't get enough "preservative" injected into the batch of gum. Hopefully all the cards were safe!
DeleteAwesome! '89-90 Topps/O-Pee-Chee were the first cards I ever opened with my brothers as a kid, so this one takes me back. I love the idea of a top-loaded stick of gum, which I don't believe I've ever seen before. That box must have been a ton of fun to rip, I should really do one some time just to relive the good ol' days!
ReplyDeleteI honestly think of your great posts on this set each time I see a card or pack from this set. I definitely recommend that plan, or buy a box to just have!
DeleteYou got a box of 89-90 Topps for $1? Unless shipping was $20, that's a nice bargain! That is one gem mint stick of 28 year old gum. Are you going to submit that beauty to PSA, or BGS? :D
ReplyDeleteHahaha, I did pay about 20 for shipping but was still more than worth it to me. I checked them out but the Sakic wasn't 10 worthy so I am probably not going to. I never really understood why people graded their commons or 2 dollar cards but I am sure they have some logic I don't quite possess.
DeleteActually I meant the gum. Sorry, bad joke. You're right though - its not worthwhile to submit commons for grading (unless they're at least 50 years old) but I'm glad someone does, or I wouldn't be able to build the '84-85 OPC set. Most of my high-grade commons were obtained from 4 Sharp Corners for $2-3 each, when it would cost at least $6 each to submit them to PSA myself.
Delete